friendliai/simple-evals-archived

friendliai/simple-evals-archived

Language: Python

License: MIT

Stars: 0

Forks: 0

Open issues: 3

Created: 2024-10-27T10:12:37Z

Pushed: 2026-04-02T10:34:15Z

Default branch: package

Fork: yes

Parent repository: openai/simple-evals

Archived: yes

README:

Overview

This repository contains a lightweight library for evaluating language models. We are open sourcing it so we can be transparent about the accuracy numbers we're publishing alongside our latest models.

Benchmark Results

| Model | Prompt | MMLU | GPQA [^8] | MATH [^6]| HumanEval | MGSM[^5] | DROP[^5] (F1, 3-shot) | SimpleQA |:----------------------------:|:-------------:|:------:|:------:|:--------:|:---------:|:------:|:--------------------------:|:---------:| | o3 | | | | | | | | | | | o3-high [^10] | n/a [^7] | 93.3 | 83.4 | 98.1 | 88.4 | 92.0 | 89.8 | 48.6 | | o3 [^9] [^10] | n/a | 92.9 | 82.8 | 97.8 | 87.4 | 92.3 | 80.6 | 49.4 | | o3-low [^10] | n/a | 92.8 | 78.6 | 96.9 | 87.3 | 91.9 | 82.3 | 49.4 | | o4-mini | | | | | | | | | | o4-mini-high [^9] [^10] | n/a | 90.3 | 81.3 | 98.2 | 99.3 | 93.5 | 78.1 | 19.3 | | o4-mini [^9] [^10] | n/a | 90.0 | 77.6 | 97.5 | 97.3 | 93.7 | 77.7 | 20.2 | | o4-mini-low [^10] | n/a | 89.5 | 73.6 | 96.2 | 95.9 | 93.0 | 76.0 | 20.2 | | o3-mini | | | | | | | | | | | o3-mini-high | n/a | 86.9 | 77.2 | 97.9 | 97.6 | 92.0 | 80.6 | 13.8 | | o3-mini | n/a | 85.9 | 74.9 | 97.3 | 96.3 | 90.8 | 79.2 | 13.4 | | o3-mini-low | n/a | 84.9 | 67.6 | 95.8 | 94.5 | 89.4 | 77.6 | 13.0 | | o1 | | | | | | | | | | o1 | n/a | 91.8 | 75.7 | 96.4 | - | 89.3 | 90.2 | 42.6 | | o1-preview | n/a | 90.8 | 73.3 | 85.5 | 92.4 | 90.8 | 74.8 | 42.4 | | o1-mini | n/a | 85.2 | 60.0 | 90.0 | 92.4 | 89.9 | 83.9 | 07.6 | | GPT-4.1 | | | | | | | | | | | gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 | assistant [^2]| 90.2 | 66.3 | 82.1 | 94.5 | 86.9 | 79.4 | 41.6 | | gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14 | assistant | 87.5 | 65.0 | 81.4 | 93.8 | 88.2 | 81.0 | 16.8 | | gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14 | assistant | 80.1 | 50.3 | 62.3 | 87.0 | 73.0 | 82.2 | 07.6 | | GPT-4o | | | | | | | | | | | gpt-4o-2024-11-20 | assistant | 85.7 | 46.0 | 68.5 | 90.2 | 90.3 | 81.5 | 38.8 | | gpt-4o-2024-08-06 | assistant | 88.7 | 53.1 | 75.9 | 90.2 | 90.0 | 79.8 | 40.1 | | gpt-4o-2024-05-13 | assistant | 87.2 | 49.9 | 76.6 | 91.0 | 89.9 | 83.7 | 39.0 | | gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 | assistant | 82.0 | 40.2 | 70.2 | 87.2 | 87.0 | 79.7 | 09.5 | | GPT-4.5-preview | | | | | | | | | | gpt-4.5-preview-2025-02-27 | assistant | 90.8 | 69.5 | 87.1 | 88.6 | 86.9 | 83.4 | 62.5 | | GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4 | | | | | | | | | | gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 | assistant | 86.7 | 49.3 | 73.4 | 88.2 | 89.6 | 86.0 | 24.2 | | gpt-4-0125-preview | assistant | 85.4 | 41.4 | 64.5 | 86.6 | 85.1 | 81.5 | n/a | | gpt-4-1106-preview | assistant | 84.7 | 42.5 | 64.3 | 83.7 | 87.1 | 83.2 | n/a | | Other Models (Reported) | | | | | | | | | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | unknown | 88.3 | 59.4 | 71.1 | 92.0 | 91.6 | 87.1 | 28.9 | | Claude 3 Opus | unknown | 86.8 | 50.4 | 60.1 | 84.9 | 90.7 | 83.1 | 23.5 | | Llama 3.1 405b | unknown | 88.6 | 50.7 | 73.8 | 89.0 | 91.6 | 84.8 | n/a | Llama 3.1 70b | unknown | 82.0 | 41.7 | 68.0 | 80.5 | 86.9 | 79.6 | n/a | Llama 3.1 8b | unknown | 68.4 | 30.4 | 51.9 | 72.6 | 68.9 | 59.5 | n/a | Grok 2 | unknown | 87.5 | 56.0 | 76.1 | 88.4 | n/a | n/a | n/a | Grok 2 mini | unknown | 86.2 | 51.0 | 73.0 | 85.7 | n/a | n/a | n/a | Gemini 1.0 Ultra | unknown | 83.7 | n/a | 53.2 | 74.4 | 79.0 | 82.4 | n/a | Gemini 1.5 Pro | unknown | 81.9 | n/a | 58.5 | 71.9 | 88.7 | 78.9 | n/a | Gemini 1.5 Flash | unknown | 77.9 | 38.6 | 40.9 | 71.5 | 75.5 | 78.4 | n/a

Background

Evals are sensitive to prompting, and there's significant variation in the formulations used in recent publications and libraries. Some use few-shot prompts or role playing prompts ("You are an expert software programmer..."). These approaches are carryovers from evaluating *base models* (rather than instruction/chat-tuned models) and from models that were worse at following instructions.

For this library, we are emphasizing the *zero-shot, chain-of-thought* setting, with simple instructions like "Solve the following multiple choice problem". We believe that this prompting technique is a better reflection of the models' performance in realistic usage.

We will not be actively maintaining this repository and monitoring PRs and Issues. In particular, we're not accepting new evals. Here are the changes we might accept.

• Bug fixes (hopefully not needed!)
• Adding adapters for new models
• Adding new rows to the table below with eval results, given new models and new system prompts.

This repository is NOT intended as a replacement for https://github.com/openai/evals, which is designed to be a comprehensive collection of a large number of evals.

Evals

This repository currently contains the following evals:

• MMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding, reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300, https://github.com/hendrycks/test, MIT License
• MATH: Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset, reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03874, https://github.com/hendrycks/math, MIT License
• GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark, reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12022, https://github.com/idavidrein/gpqa/, MIT License
• DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs, reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.00161, https://allenai.org/data/drop, Apache License 2.0
• MGSM: Multilingual Grade School Math Benchmark (MGSM), Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners, reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03057, https://github.com/google-research/url-nlp, [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0…