CoreWeave Registry: The System of Record for Enterprise AI Assets

CoreWeave Registry: Manage, Discover, and Deploy AI Assets

Announcement

Webinar

Podcast

GTC 2026

CoreWeave Forge is here: connect your AI loop and compound every improvement. Read more

Infrastructure

CoreWeave Forge

Solutions

Resources

Log in

| Sign up Contact us

Contact us

Clear

Building a promising model or agent is only the beginning. The harder operational questions come next. Which version should an application use? What data and parameters produced it? Has it passed evaluation? Who approved it for production? And, if performance changes, can the team reproduce, retrain, and safely replace it? These questions become more difficult as AI adoption spreads across an organization. Models, agents, datasets, prompts, evaluation results, and other artifacts multiply across teams and environments. Without a shared system of record, the path from development to production depends on scattered files, local conventions, and institutional memory. CoreWeave Registry provides a system of record for managing every asset throughout its lifecycle. It combines versioning, aliases, lineage tracking, permissions, and discovery in a single source of truth. The result is a foundation for reliable AI delivery: researchers and engineers can find the right asset, understand how it was produced, and move it toward production with confidence. For platform and MLOps teams, Registry offers the same foundation from a different angle: a centralized stack with role-based access controls, so governance and reliability scale with the organization instead of depending on ad hoc conventions, team by team. Why production AI depends on reliable asset management Object storage can preserve a file. A source repository can track code. An experiment tracker can capture runs. But production AI requires a coherent view across all of them. An asset is useful only when teams can answer questions such as: Identity: What is this, and which version am I looking at? How is it performing? Provenance: What produced it, and can I trust it? Lifecycle and access: Where is it in its journey, and who's allowed to touch it? Workflow: What should happen when it changes?

CoreWeave Registry enables enterprise-grade asset management, preserving both the artifact and the context required to use it safely. Each registered asset can carry a version, assigned aliases, lineage, tags, ownership, and other key metadata. Instead of passing opaque files between teams, organizations can establish a common contract around identity, provenance, and lifecycle state. Trust and lineage CoreWeave Registry supports teams working with assets from development through to staging and production. Teams can publish work from experiments, review it collaboratively, and promote approved versions without losing the history behind them. Three capabilities make that full lifecycle manageable. Immutable versions create durable references A training workflow can publish a new model version; an agent-development pipeline can register an updated agent configuration; a data pipeline can add a new dataset snapshot. Existing versions remain available for inspection and reuse. This gives both people and automated systems a durable reference. A deployment can pin an exact version for consistency, while an investigation can compare current behavior with an earlier release. Aliases express operational intent Exact versions are essential for reproducibility, but delivery workflows also need stable references. Aliases can identify the version currently designated for a purpose, for example, candidate , staging , or production .

Because an alias can move from one version to another, downstream systems do not need hard-coded knowledge of every new version identifier. The alias becomes a controlled handoff point. After a candidate passes required checks, a workflow can assign the production alias to the approved version and trigger automated deployment. The production pointer then remains until it’s moved. Aliases should not replace immutable version references in audit records. Instead, they complement them: aliases communicate current intent, while versions preserve the exact historical state. Lineage preserves the chain of evidence Lineage connects an artifact to the work that produced it. Detailed lineage and experiment logging make it possible to identify the relevant runs, inputs, parameters, and upstream artifacts. And, Lineage isn't limited to assets built inside your own pipelines. When a model is imported  (from Hugging Face, for example), Registry preserves its origin as part of the record, so an external asset carries the same traceable history as one trained in-house. Teams don't have to choose between using outside work and maintaining a coherent system of record. This chain of evidence matters during routine iteration, not only audits. When an artifact performs well, teams can reproduce it. When it fails, they can understand the cause. When an upstream dataset or model changes, they can identify the downstream impact ahead of time. Workflow-connected automation Registry provides a stable interface between development systems and production automation. Models can enter the governed workflow through a training or build job. Now they can also enter through a managed import from Hugging Face: flowchart TD A[Experiment or build] --> C[Register version] B[Import from Hugging Face] --> C C --> D[Validate lineage and metadata] D --> E[Evaluate in a Sandbox or automated pipeline] E --> F{Policy checks pass ?} F -- No --> G[Return feedback] G --> A F -- Yes --> H[Assign release alias] H --> I[Deploy and monitor] Once registered, users can select an exact version of an asset and launch it directly as a live endpoint in a CoreWeave Sandbox to evaluate behavior or build prototypes without provisioning persistent infrastructure up front. Evaluation results can initiate additional automated testing, security scanning, policy validation, or human review. If the asset satisfies the organization’s release criteria, an alias can be assigned, which then triggers deployment into staging or production through an automated pipeline. This model separates artifact creation and experimentation from release approval. Teams can iterate quickly, evaluate models in Sandboxes, and publish new versions without granting every experiment a path to production. At the same time, release pipelines receive a consistent, machine-readable signal indicating which...